The Lost City of Z

Interesting portrait of a man, indeed but as a movie it almost lost me.
It’s one of those labor of loves it seems as the film felt like it was more interested in making an artistic narrative than it was about making money. I can respect that, but it was a boring movie.
The Lost city of Z is about a British explorer named Percy Fawcett who while on a survey mission in the amazon discovers evidence that the “savages” once had a civilization the might even be older than the one he came from and spends his life trying to find it.
I loved Charlie Hunnam in it. Hands down his most grown up acting performance, and really made Fawcett a compelling man to follow.
In fact the whole cast was impressive with Sienna Miller as Fawcett’s wife and Robert Patterson who I totally did not recognize under the bread as Fawcett’s most trusted companion on his trips. Tom Holland is also in the movie as Fawcett’s oldest son who joins him on his last journey to the amazon. Other people gave great performances, but these are the ones I knew by name, making it a pretty stellar cast for me.
While this movie does such a a great job making Fawcett’s life look fascinating,following him through his time with the army to his time as an explorer, I must admit that the slow burn of the narrative almost put me to sleep. It reminds me of another project Brad Pitt (Who produced it) was evolved in, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford. Though the Lost City of Z is not as painfully slow (notice the tile is half that of the Jesse James movie), the combination of the quiet tone and it’s speed was not something I wanted to sit in a movie theater and watch.   It’s not that the movie is long, it’s that it feels long, and it feels like something that the movie does on purpose.
I feel like the movie tries to gives us the realest accounts of a man’s life as they can and I can respect that, but man, the two hours and thirty minutes this film comes in at was not easy at all to get through. That’s just my warning.